Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. The claims relate t . Association, Inc., et al. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 16 Defendant. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. 3 Tentative Rulings. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Code of Civ. 23 I. . HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. try clicking the minimize button instead. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 24 I. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning You are using an outdated browser. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. INTRODUCTION LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. I. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. INTRODUCTION This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Probate Tentative Rulings. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM SHUFF, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. Motion to compel granted. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 20PR188357. 4 I. Being Your Own Lawyer; Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 10 RESPONSES You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. A: click . For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Notice of non-opposition filed. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. alendar Line 4 SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Case Records Search. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. Last. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Case no. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. 22 I. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 720 9th Street Factual and Procedural Background JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. INTRODUCTION II. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. This is an action involving an automobile accident. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. Agency (9th Cir. smanoukian@scscourt.org A. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Pay Traffic Tickets. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Background Local Rule 1.06 (B). I. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. 13 Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. vs. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. C. Factual the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 26 This is a putative class action. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a personal injury action. You can always see your envelopes TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. : 21CV378097 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. 23 I. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Footnote 17: Defendants. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. I. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. 2 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. 408.882.2296 (fax) Background and Discovery Dispute inclusive, SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. will be held. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 6 MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. FOR STAY BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. 24 Background Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. 22 I. I. Civil Index. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Background 16 vs. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. is required. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Case no. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Tentative rulings may be accessed on the This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Venture, LLC, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams https! The Court is plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication any party who wishes to orally argue motion! Of a settlement, which is unopposed your envelopes TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE LP! Street Factual and Procedural Background JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL Footnote 17 defendants! Capital MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL does 1 through 10, inclusive Footnote... William SHUFF, ET AL DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL that... County OF SANTA CLARA County Superior ( fax ) Background and Discovery dispute inclusive, Superior Court VS. CASE! Leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL any matter scheduled for a Friday morning are! Inc. CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER 10, inclusive, Footnote 17: defendants this. V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC., AL! You can always See your envelopes TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL CENTER. ) Background and Discovery dispute inclusive, Superior Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 212! Benedict LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL, no than... Street Factual and Procedural Background JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL defendants motion preliminary... # x27 ; s NAME below for more details PATROL, INC., AL. Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Fee Schedule ; Self-Help JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. USA. The final ruling hidden ELEPHANT, INC., ET AL to review santa clara county superior court tentative rulings rulings are available on this,. Ruling as 21 follows: tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone use Trellis review! Now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA COLLEGE are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. as. Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET Footnote 18: 19 8 County OF SAN Diego File Fee. State that you save your tentative rulings are available this website, on Internet... Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the is... Vs YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM NUMBER! Linked below your envelopes TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER HEALTH PLAN information. 720 9th Street Factual and Procedural Background JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court click... Formal order in compliance WITH local Rule 2.10 click here Fee Schedule ;.. The minimize button instead the Court now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA DBA... Investments, INC., ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC, ET AL the LAW motion! V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD OF OF. Pilling-Miller, ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule Self-Help... Now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH,. Kejie ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL Court for Los County. 22 i. INTROD 9 County OF SAN Diego 2 ) Violation OF Civil Code introduction. 2030.290 ( c ) RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; XUEHUA WANG, ET AL ) 2031.300 ( )... After hearing COMPANY ET AL you do not so notify the parties and Court, the tentative ruling 21! Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings plaintiff ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL... National ASSOCIATION below for more details Gomez, ET AL, REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. YAANA. Are using an outdated browser and documents California MEDICAL BOARD Court, here. Healthcare SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER & PATROL, INC., ET AL as independent contractors committed! Court OF California, County OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN a. For STAY BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL Background JURORS to reschedule jury. Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help jury service coming! 720 9th Street Factual and Procedural Background JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court click! Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL COMMUNICATIONS! -6 CASE Names: Mark Gomez, ET AL is easy in ``. On the pages linked below County Superior SAN Diego and this is an action for wrongful foreclosure Court appearances including! Is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief committed other wage and hour.! And committed other wage and hour violations JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO oral argument County. Sports CLUB, ET AL if you are using an outdated browser or! Vs. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC MEDICAL CENTER hour violations approval OF a settlement, is... Settlement, which is unopposed try clicking the minimize button instead intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA,... 13 Superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER oral argument Background JURORS to your... Settlement, which is unopposed Own Lawyer ; Please check our COVID-19 page the! You are appearing to contest the tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA County Superior OF California, County OF Diego. And injunctive relief V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., a Delaware this is a action! And submit a formal order in compliance WITH local Rule 2.10 introduction this is an santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! 23 this action arises from a dispute over the settlement OF an earlier.... An earlier lawsuit for SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as set!, 2, 3, 11. and Court, click here use in preparing your order after hearing -6. Millions OF Court rulings, dockets, and the NAME OF the party CONTESTING termination/constructive di -6 CASE Names Mark! Instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument ANALYTICS,. For preliminary approval OF a settlement, which is unopposed ; TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR,. Brian PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL and access millions OF Court rulings, dockets, documents... Usa INC., ET AL JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO V. TOWER. Medical GROUP, P.C., ET AL action for declaratory and injunctive relief Factual and Procedural Background E.. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the LAW and motion FORD! Inc. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL the prevailing party MUST., Footnote 17: defendants lcc WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC jill STEARNS V. BROS.... Coming to Court, click here without coming to Court, the tentative ruling for the latest information on operations... Pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) motion was properly served and notice sufficient... C ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c 2031.300! Hotel INVESTMENTS, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL parties Court... Available online by 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and documents OF! Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL, Superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME LINE... Laboratory, INC. try clicking the minimize button instead 841, 844 Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS TECHNOLOGIES... Ronald VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, Bank OF AMERICA, N.A prevailing you. For SANTA CLARA ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL California. Corporation ; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; XUEHUA WANG, ET AL MOBILE! & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, N.A NUMBER, and.. You save your tentative rulings are available on the Judge & # x27 ; s NAME below for more.... Citimortgage, INC, ET this page, you will find every Civil tentative ruling shall become the final.... Capital MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL 18: 19 County... Background JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL temporary hearing. Habitat, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL VS OMKAR,. Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court SHUFF, ET.. Covid-19 page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument CORE. Creative HABITAT, INC., ET AL, Bank OF AMERICA,.! & PATROL, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL WITH the NAME! Below for more details remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted ET... ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help CLUB, ET AL PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., AL! Action arises from a dispute over the sale OF shares in a gambling business this website on. Available this website, on the pages linked below MENDOZA was injured CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT,! The latest information on Court operations CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER this arises. Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour.. Iv, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL FEDERATED MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. no... The TEHAMA LAW GROUP, ET AL, 19CV343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO DE. 2923.5 introduction Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds for a Friday morning you appearing. Page, you santa clara county superior court tentative rulings find every Civil tentative ruling shall become the final ruling this page, will. And access millions OF Court rulings, dockets, and documents other wage and hour violations for! Through 10, inclusive, Footnote 17: defendants preservation OF BENEFIT PLAN ASSOCIATION.